Although the Sarajevo assassination
itself has been well documented, even now, 100 years later, there is still much
controversy about the events themselves, the participants, and the
implications.
So let’s start with the least controversial part: why a major
war could be set off, in the prediction of the great German statesman Otto von
Bismarck, by “some damned foolish thing in the Balkans.” Then, as now, a crisis
in the Middle East provided a challenge. In the second decade of the 20th
century, statesmen were debating “the Eastern Question”: the future of the
areas that still remained part of the Ottoman Empire. After 600 years as a
world power, the once great Ottoman Empire was struggling to adjust to changing
times. Many people were calling it “the sick man of Europe” and questioning
whether the sick man’s death would lead to a major war among the European
powers. [Whether or not the “sick man” was truly moribund is debatable,
especially as the Empire would go on to fight effectively on many different
fronts, but that is not something people could have foreseen in 1914.] In fact,
people had been worrying about the Eastern Question for the past century and a
half. Why was the issue an especially dangerous problem in 1914?
The answers for this are
complicated, but three factors in particular are relevant to this discussion.
Each of them involves the Great Powers of Europe: Great Britain, France,
Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Russia. (Remember that the U.S. was not yet
considered a “great power.”)
First, these powerful European
countries were engaged in a race for foreign colonies – in order to expand
their economic and political influence. The declining Ottoman Empire contained
many areas that they all wanted to control: the Turkish Straits, for example,
because of their strategic significance, the Arab lands because of their
resources and location along the Mediterranean, and the Balkan Peninsula
because of its location in Europe.
Second, two of the powers –
Austria-Hungary and Russia – were multi-national empires in a time in which
modern nationalism was making their political structure and organization seem
very outdated. The Austrian Empire was particularly threatened by Serbian
nationalism in the Balkans because Austria-Hungary contained millions of people
who spoke some dialect of the Serbo-Croatian language, and some of them were
talking of breaking away and uniting them with Serbia. This possibility worried
the Austrian leadership, who then wanted to take over formerly Ottoman
territories in Europe, like Bosnia. (This was not because the Austrians really
wanted more Serbian-speaking people in their empire, but because they didn’t want Serbia to have those lands
and become more powerful.) Russia, of course, priding itself on being the
protector of Orthodox Christians, backed up Serbia and its interests. The
result: any problem in the Balkans would easily lead to a bigger war between
Russia and Austria.
This brings us to the third factor:
the newly consolidated alliance system, pitting Austria, Germany, and Italy, on
one side, against Great Britain, France, and Russia, on the other. This meant
that if Austria were to go to war with Russia, Germany and Italy would back
Austria, while Great Britain and France would rush to the defense of their
ally, Russia. In other words, everyone knew in 1914 that a small spark could
ignite a really big war.
The general consensus in 1914 was
that war was coming and that it would probably begin in the Balkans. Actually,
there had been almost continuous conflict in the Balkans for just over a
century. Yet far from lessening, the conflicts just seemed to be intensifying
in the early years of the 20th century. In 1908 Austria had formally
annexed Bosnia-Herzegovina, a previously Ottoman province that it had occupied
since the 1870s. This act had enraged nationalists throughout the Balkans and
intensified the hatred between Austria and Serbia. Then, there were the two
Balkan Wars of 1912 and 1913, which involved several of the small Balkan
countries and the Ottoman Empire. (Later, some people would dub World War I the
“Third Balkan War.”) By 1913, the Ottoman Empire had been mostly driven out of
the Balkans, leaving Austria-Hungary as the sole remaining foreign power in the
area.
By 1914 Bosnia was a center of
unrest, especially among the small educated part of the population, most of
whom were young people in their teens and twenties. With no army or government
of their own, these youthful revolutionaries knew that change could only come
about through an intervention of powerful countries like Russia or Britain. In
their view, the only way to get this intervention would be in the event of a
crisis. Many of them believed that the quickest way to provoke a crisis was
through political assassination – assassinating an Austrian political leader
would lead to Austrian intervention in Bosnia, which would lead to Russian
intercession in Bosnia’s behalf. It seemed to make perfect sense, especially
when news got out that the heir to the Austrian throne would parade through the
streets of Sarajevo on a day that would particularly offend the Serbs: the
anniversary of the day on which they had lost their independence to Ottoman
conquerors. (You can imagine that much of the population of Bosnia would be
outraged to see a parade by another conqueror
on that day of mourning!)
The assassination of Franz
Ferdinand was not the work of one – or even two – students: it was a conspiracy
that directly involved dozens of people and indirectly involved many, many
more. Six young people (five of whom were high school students between the ages
of 16 and 19) went to the parade carrying weapons and intending to kill the
royal visitor; others assisted or at least knew about the plot; a number of
officials from Serbia (one of whom was a member of the government of Serbia –
though he was acting without the authorization of his government) supplied the
weapons and other assistance.
No one was surprised that the
assassination took place and that it led to a war! However, it was a great
shock to the students involved in the plot – and to most other people at the
time – that the war turned out to be so long and so incredibly bloody. The
killing of the archduke and his wife would set off a chain of events: Austria
attacked Serbia; Russia backed Serbia; the alliance system came into play
pulling Britain and France in on Russia’s side and Germany in on Austria’s. Not
to be outdone, the Ottoman Empire joined in too – on the side of the Central
Powers (Germany, Austria). The Great War had begun.
No comments:
Post a Comment